Preakness 2013: Redemption for ‘Figure Handicapping’
Orb, Orb, Orb… I finally understood how Jan Brady felt.
Frankly, I wasn’t that impressed with the horse and had
trouble understanding what all the fuss was about — kind of like Nicki Minaj’s
career. Even after he made me look foolish in Louisville, I still wasn’t
convinced that Orb had what it took to be the subject of a future Disney movie, much less a
Triple Crown winner.
 |
|
(Click on image to enlarge)
|
Of course, I made this determination based on numbers: speed
ratings and my own pace figures (speed rations) — and that’s
where the trouble started. You see, I found out from racing fans and other media
types that the data I’ve relied on to guide me through the perilous pari-mutuel
waters for more than 20 years were, well, worthless.
Beyer was (and presumably still is) an idiot; Tom
Brohamer is a complete moron; Bill Quirin is a certified loon — and I belong in
a padded cell for ever listening to and/or learning from these whakos.
According to Orb supporters, the colt’s dominance in the
Run for the Roses was a matter of will — not pace, not speed. Indeed, legendary
turf writer Damyon Runyon was dead wrong when he said, “The race is not always
to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, but that's the way to bet.” The way
to bet, I was told, is to ignore speed and pace figures like the stuff growing
hair in my refrigerator and focus instead on how a horse looks and how it
behaves. Only by becoming an expert in body language can one hope to triumph at
the windows, I was informed.
Then came the Preakness Stakes… and complete and total
redemption for figure handicapping.
While Orb mania reached a fever pitch throughout
cyberspace, I expressed concern about the condition of Shug McGaughey’s stable
star on my May15 podcast, speculating that he was likely to regress in the Preakness and
voicing concerns about his fair odds.
 |
| (Click on image to enlarge) |
(For a snippet of my pre-Preakness thoughts on Orb and
Oxbow, click HERE.)
When the race ran true to the numbers (at least my numbers) — Oxbow was the winner, Itsmyluckyday
finished second, Mylute rallied for third and Orb straggled home a distant
fourth — the “body language” crowd was quick to blame the Derby champ’s defeat
on jockey Joel Rosario’s incompetence, the “dead” rail, the pace, George Bush
(just a hunch), etc.
As for me, I gave silent thanks to Beyer, Quinn and Quirin
and collected my superfecta winnings.
Monday Win Factor Reports
Coming soon... I hope.
Monday Win Factor Reports
Coming soon... I hope.
10 comments:
Great analysis, once I saw the numbers come out for derby was very happy with my selection in mylute, thought he would progress but didn't think so many other horses would put up better numbers. I was going to be on IMLD in preakness but was debating on using Orb on top, thanks to the show just played IMLD in 2nd and third spot. Small winner oppose to loser. I commend you on sticking to your numbers based approach when all you hear in the media is oh Orb looks fantastics coming out of the derby, shug is so happy. Well done-DH
Hi, I find reading this article a joy. It is extremely helpful and interesting and very much looking forward to reading more of your work..
Paint Removal Reston VA
It's interesting how the hype around a horse can be so intense head soccer leading up to a big race. Sometimes it's hard to understand what all the fuss is about until you see the horse perform.
Tap along with the beat in fnf a game where precision and timing are key. Master each track, outplay your rivals, and win over Girlfriend's heart in this funky rhythm challenge.
Nice http://blog.twinspires.com/2013/05/preakness-2013-redemption-for-figure.html
Love this angle on the Preakness. 🏇
The 2013 race really did feel like a comeback moment for figure handicapping, especially after all the doubts earlier that season. It’s a good reminder that data and patience still matter in horse racing. I enjoy reading these deeper breakdowns because they add context beyond just who won. When I want to stay in that sports mindset, I’ll often switch over to live races or highlights on Sportzfy APK iOS. It keeps the analysis connected to the real action.
Really interesting take on figure handicapping vs the “eye test” crowd. It’s a good reminder that data-driven approaches still hold strong value, especially when narratives take over.
That balance between numbers and experience shows up in other areas too — even when exploring digital platforms, I’ve seen similar discussions around performance and usability on resources like the MagisTV official site.
Really enjoyed this breakdown—especially the pushback against the “body language over data” narrative. It’s interesting how often people abandon proven metrics after one big result, even though long-term consistency usually comes from structured analysis like speed and pace figures. That same mindset applies in everyday digital habits too—people experiment a lot with how they consume content across devices, and platforms like Xuper TV official site reflect how users optimize based on performance and reliability rather than hype.
Great read—this really highlights how sticking to data-driven methods pays off in the long run, even when public opinion swings the other way. The contrast between hype and measurable performance is clear here, especially with how the Preakness played out. That same principle applies in tech as well, where users tend to rely on tools that consistently perform rather than just follow trends, similar to Delta executor iOS in mobile environments.
Really enjoyed this take—sticking with speed and pace figures despite all the noise takes confidence. It’s a great example of how data-driven approaches tend to win over time, even when public sentiment goes the other way. That same mindset applies in other areas too, where consistency matters more than hype, like when users rely on platforms such as YouCine streaming app for a more stable and predictable experience.
Post a Comment