The Truth About the Pick Three
At one time, the goal of most racetrack gamblers — if
they had a goal at all — was to pick winners. Read any handicapping book published
before Al Gore invented the Internet (when a “cell phone” was still a phone
used by prison inmates) and you’ll see what I mean.
In the original “Betting Thoroughbreds,” for example, Steve
Davidowitz discusses Beyer speed figures — then produced by the man himself and
not the Daily Racing Form — by
relating how they affected his success rate.
“In the first season, the results said 176 winners in 310
picks. Fifty-three percent,” Davidowitz wrote. “A flat bet profit in all
categories.”
Nowhere in his book does Davidowitz mention what that
flat-bet profit, or return on investment (ROI), was. That’s because, back then,
it didn’t matter. The assumption was that if one could “out-pick” the crowd,
one would win.
Two decades later, Andrew Beyer realized how wrong this premise had been.
Two decades later, Andrew Beyer realized how wrong this premise had been.
“At Gulfstream Park in 1990, all of my worst fears about
the nature of the pari-mutuel competition materialized,” the dean of
speed-figure handicapping wrote. “My speed figures — which had now advanced
into the computer age — had never been so refined. I was watching races,
assessing individual horses’ efforts, and detecting track biases more astutely
than ever before. I was handling my money and my emotions with skill and
maturity — a great step forward from the time I punched a hole through the wall
of Gulfstream’s press box in a rage over an unjust disqualification. I felt
that I was at the very top of my game as a gambler. And still I couldn’t win.
My lack of success was due not to bad luck or photo finishes or any of the
other traumas that plague all horseplayers. My frustration was best demonstrated
by some of the winners I picked — by horses like Memorable Skier.”
Beyer went on to say that Memorable Skier had finished out of the money (worse than third) in all of his nine career races against maiden competition and was now facing winners, which, under normal circumstances, would make the horse an instant toss for most handicappers.
“But his speed figures were competitive and, in his last start, [Memorable Skier] had been forced to race wide on a track with a strong rail-favoring bias,” Beyer explained. “Now he was running again on a day when the rail was an advantage, and he had drawn post position 5, with four slow-breaking horses inside him. I concluded that the maiden would be able to drop to the rail and lead all the way. When I went to the track that day, prepared to make a killing, I thought Memorable Skier embodied all of the handicapping skills I had spent a lifetime learning.
Beyer went on to say that Memorable Skier had finished out of the money (worse than third) in all of his nine career races against maiden competition and was now facing winners, which, under normal circumstances, would make the horse an instant toss for most handicappers.
“But his speed figures were competitive and, in his last start, [Memorable Skier] had been forced to race wide on a track with a strong rail-favoring bias,” Beyer explained. “Now he was running again on a day when the rail was an advantage, and he had drawn post position 5, with four slow-breaking horses inside him. I concluded that the maiden would be able to drop to the rail and lead all the way. When I went to the track that day, prepared to make a killing, I thought Memorable Skier embodied all of the handicapping skills I had spent a lifetime learning.
“The race went just as I expected,” Beyer went on. “Memorable
Skier popped out of the gate, angled to the rail, led all the way to win by six
lengths — and paid $6.20. A pitiful $6.20.
“Even at a track heavily populated by tourists and
retirees, the betting public had become smart and well-informed,” Beyer
concluded.
While I don’t necessarily believe that the crowd had
suddenly become “smart and well-informed” (I think that was always the case to
a certain degree), it is noteworthy that Beyer was complaining about Memorable
Skier’s price after the race had been
run (and he had presumably bet). Outside of his reference to making “a
killing,” he gave no indication as what his expectations were before the race.
Fast forward another 20 years and little has changed in
the minds of some handicappers. Despite declining field sizes, arguably fewer
quality races, drugs (both legal and illegal) and a host of other new variables
to muddle the handicapping picture, many folks analyze races today like they
did when Sheena Easton won
a Grammy for Best New Artist — they focus entirely on picking the winner.
Of course, many realize, as Beyer did, that prices are
not what they once were on standout horses, particularly those with a speed or
class edge. Enter the horizontal wager: the pick-3, pick-4, pick-5 and pick-6.
Because these types of bets focus almost entirely on
picking the race winner, bettors flock to them like foam
fingers to Miley Cyrus. But are these kinds of bets such a great deal?
Personally, I have my doubts, so I decided to conduct a little test.
I looked at my database stats for Saratoga during the first week of August in an effort to determine whether or not pick-3 wagering, in particular, made more sense (and more dollars, for that matter) than straight win betting.
I looked at my database stats for Saratoga during the first week of August in an effort to determine whether or not pick-3 wagering, in particular, made more sense (and more dollars, for that matter) than straight win betting.
First, because so many pick-three bettors are looking to
beat the favorite in one or more of the legs, I checked to see how the
post-time favorite in pick-3 sequences fared over the studied period (Aug.
1-5):
Favorites: 49Winners: 12Win Rate: 24.5%ROI: -36.43%
Next, I determined what the average $2 pick-3 returned:
Avg. Pick-3 Payoff (46 sequences): $353.78
Then, I computed what a simple $2 parlay on the same
races would have produced:
Avg. Three-Race Parlay (46 sequences, same races as above): $295.90
“Ah-ha,” I can hear some of you exclaim. “You see, you see (you’re a very
excitable lot), the pick-3 offers better value than a parlay” (which is
typically the argument for pick-3
wagering).
OK, that’s true; has been for many years. This is due to the fact that the pick-3 pool extracts takeout and breakage, albeit at a higher rate, just once, whereas each race in a three-race parlay is subject to the track and government’s wrath.
OK, that’s true; has been for many years. This is due to the fact that the pick-3 pool extracts takeout and breakage, albeit at a higher rate, just once, whereas each race in a three-race parlay is subject to the track and government’s wrath.
What this viewpoint ignores is something that economists
refer to as “opportunity costs,” or the foregone benefits of other options. And
I would argue that those benefits, in many cases, are better than those offered
by the pick-three.
Permit me to explain: Let’s say that you like Horse A, at, say, 4-5 odds, in a particular race. But because of the short price, you decide to bet a pick-3 singling Horse A in the opening leg. Assuming that Horse A wins, what kind of a return do you need to beat the resulting $3.60 payoff?
Permit me to explain: Let’s say that you like Horse A, at, say, 4-5 odds, in a particular race. But because of the short price, you decide to bet a pick-3 singling Horse A in the opening leg. Assuming that Horse A wins, what kind of a return do you need to beat the resulting $3.60 payoff?
Many of you will say $3.61… and many of you would be
wrong. A $3.61 payoff assumes a single $2 bet and a 100 percent strike rate in
each of the two remaining legs of the pick-3… which could only be guaranteed if one were to cover all the
possible combinations.
So, for the sake of argument, let’s pretend there are
eight horses in each of the last two legs of our mythical pick-3. Assuming that
we hit the “ALL” button, our ticket cost now stands at $128 ($2 x 1 x 8 x 8).
Hence, we would need a pick-3 payoff of $230.40 to match (not exceed) what a corresponding $128 win bet on Horse A
would have returned.
This is not good news considering that the three pick-3’s in my study that led off with an odds-on winner returned an average of $166.47. Granted, a three-race sample is hardly proof of concept, but it’s not encouraging either.
“But Derek,” I hear some of you complaining, “nobody hits
the ‘ALL’ button on two legs, especially with a big favorite leading off.”
A valid point, but keep in mind: The minute one starts limiting the pick-3 combinations, one’s winning percentage goes down. So what started as a high percentage play on a 4-5 shot now becomes a much lower-percentage one.
A valid point, but keep in mind: The minute one starts limiting the pick-3 combinations, one’s winning percentage goes down. So what started as a high percentage play on a 4-5 shot now becomes a much lower-percentage one.
And that uncertainty must be taken into account if one is playing for profit and not
just the gratification of having a winning ticket.
Are You Ready For Some Football?
With the kickoff of the NFL season on Thursday, I thought I would re-post a video I did for Youbet.com a few years ago.
Are You Ready For Some Football?
With the kickoff of the NFL season on Thursday, I thought I would re-post a video I did for Youbet.com a few years ago.
18 comments:
Heaps of producers offer extraordinary financing on vehicles in this program too at bring down rates than new auto advances or higher utilized auto credit rates. You ought to know however that they pay more for a vehicle in this program instead of a general utilized auto. The higher cost could be justified, despite all the trouble as a rule for the additional scope and assurance. payday loan san diego
In my opinion, students are interested in getting scholarship for sure. On https://justbuyessay.com/blog/scholarship-essay you can find writing advices that might help you with this.
Amazing sharing, thanks for sharing with the online community. Root explorer Viper4android youtubevanced
Through our experts, we offer all kinds of Nursing Research Paper Services and Nursing Research Writing Help Services to suit the needs of every student when they are given any Nursing Research Paper Writing Services.
En iyi takipçi satış sitesi: instagram takipçi satın al
En iyi takipçi pazarlaması instagram takipçi satın al
Senin icin varız instagram takipçi satın al
Makine olanlara selam olsun instagram takipçi satın al
Hekim çağırın instagram takipçi satın al
https://rspcb.safety.fhwa.dot.gov/pageRedirect.aspx?RedirectedURL=http%3A%2F%2Fhukukidurum.com%2F
En iyi Görev Sitesi http://gorevturk.com
https://www.hukukidurum.com/vatandasliktan-cikma/
https://www.hukukidurum.com/vatandasliktan-cikma/
hukuki danışmanlık
hukuki danışmanlık
En hızlı instagram takipçi satın al
Summative Assessment-1 (SA-1) Exams are known as Half Yearly or Term-1 / Sem-1 exams, So every AP State Board Telugu Medium, English Medium or Urdu medium student can download the SCERT AP 7th Class SA-1 AP 7th Class sa 1 Model Paper Model Paper 2023 with answers for theory, objectives and bit questions for all evaluations of the first semester. Summative Assessment-1 (SA-1) Exams are known as Half Yearly or Term-1 / Sem-1 exams, So every AP State Board Telugu Medium, English Medium or Urdu medium student can download the SCERT AP 7th Class SA-1 Model Paper 2023 with answers for theory, objectives and bit questions for all evaluations of the first semester.
It's so good
Post a Comment