Showing posts with label Secretariat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Secretariat. Show all posts
  • Morning Musings

    POSTED Jul 31, 2014
    A Perfect Storm

    On Aug. 1, 1922, a seven-year-old gelding by the name of Exterminator finished last, beaten 10 ¼ lengths by Grey Lag, in the Saratoga Handicap. Grey Lag was the 3-5 favorite that day, while Exterminator was 5-1 in the betting.

    For Grey Lag, the win atoned for an earlier head loss to Exterminator in the Brooklyn Handicap at Aqueduct, where the chestnut colt was once again the 3-5 public choice. In fact, in 1922, Grey Lag was favored in every race he ran. After winning nine of 13 starts and being named Horse of the Year in 1921, the four-year-old son of Star Shoot was victorious in five of six trips to post in 1922.

    However, it was Exterminator, a horse that lost six of 17 races — three by double-digit margins — who was voted top older horse that year. Because, in 1922, winning mattered; losing was just a step on the path to success.

    Fast forward to 2014 when 17 starts would be viewed as a gut-wrenching campaign and losing even a single race is considered a badge of shame.

    When Untapable, a magnificent three-year-old filly, who drew comparisons to Rachel Alexandra by longtime turf writer Jennie Rees, finished a well-beaten fifth in the Haskell Invitational last Sunday one would have thought that Zippy Chippy had raced in her stead judging by the reaction on social media.


    (Click on image to enlarge)

    I witnessed Untapable called “a fraud,” “overrated” and “counterfeit.” Untapable’s jockey, Rosie Napravnik, who, earlier this year, was being touted as one of the best female jockeys ever, received even more abuse. According to the social media crowd, it’s a wonder Napravnik can even dress herself, much less ride a horse.   

    Yet, lost in all the hyperbole, is the fact that the Haskell was one race… one stumble… one fall in an otherwise stellar campaign for a filly that may not be Rachel Alexandra (which is like saying that a great basketball player is not Michael Jordan), but is still pretty darn good.

    What’s more, as I stated on my podcast two weeks before the race, Monmouth Park is not exactly a neutral playing field. In 2013, 42 percent of all dirt sprints and 31 percent of all dirt routes were won in wire-to-wire fashion at the New Jersey track. At 1 1/16 miles or greater, 39 percent of the winners led from flag fall to finish.

    With Bayern as the controlling speed — Social Inclusion’s best-ever early speed ration (ESR) wasn’t as good as Bayern’s -6 figure in the Woody Stephens — the result was hardly unpredictable.

    (Click on image to enlarge)

    (Click on image to enlarge)

    Medicinal Grass for Social Inclusion?

    (Click on image to enlarge)

    So I had a thought: With Social Inclusion now in the care of Chad Brown, why not try the son of Pioneerof the Nile on the grass?

    First of all, Brown is an outstanding turf trainer, having won 25.2 percent of his 1,390 starts on the lawn since 2008. Better still, he shows a positive ROI (albeit a slight one) with horses making their turf debuts.

    Secondly, although Social Inclusion’s mama (Saint Bernadette) never raced on the green stuff, nor foaled a turf winner, his papa (Pioneerof the Nile) broke his maiden on the grass and, in fact, never won on the dirt (his four other wins came on synthetic surfaces). What’s more, Pioneerof the Nile’s progeny have won eight (of 61) turf races and earned an average Brisnet speed figure of 72.6 — three points higher than their average BSF on dirt (69.6).

    Lastly, Social Inclusion’s running style makes me think he could a Sidney’s Candy type. On the dirt, Sidney’s Candy had only moderate early foot; but on the turf, he was a front-running dynamo and it propelled him to two graded wins and a course record in his turf debut, the La Jolla Handicap.

    Say it Ain’t So Allen

    For the first time in over 65 years, H. Allen Jerkens, the legendary trainer who beat Secretariat twice, is not at Saratoga for that track’s 40-day meet. Instead, the 85-year-old trainer is in Hallandale, Florida, preparing a small stable of horses to race at Gulfstream Park.

    Unlike Mark Sanchez, Jerkens is greatly missed.

    “His not being here just feels wrong,” former jockey and current NYRA racing analyst Richard Migliore told timesunion.com.

    In a related news story, the temperature in Hell reached a record low yesterday and flying swine were spotted over parts of the northeast.
  • The ‘Souped-Up’ Racetrack

    POSTED Mar 14, 2014
    John Lydgate once said: “You can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time.”

    Lydgate was a monk and a poet, not a horseplayer. Had he been, I doubt he would have been so optimistic.

    Racing fans, it seems, can’t be pleased at any time.

    Case in point: Game On Dude.


    (Click on image to enlarge)

    Here’s a seven-year-old gelding that does what every racing fan clamors for — he competes. Game On Dude has raced 31 times and averaged over six starts per year since he debuted on Jan. 23, 2010. He has raced at Gulfstream Park, Churchill Downs, Lone Star Park, Belmont Park, Charles Town, Hollywood Park, Del Mar, Santa Anita… he’s even raced at Meydan Racecourse in Dubai.

    The son of Awesome Again has won prestigious races like the Pacific Classic, the Hollywood Gold Cup (twice) and, just a few days ago, he became the first horse in history to win the Santa Anita Handicap three times.

    That’s something John Henry couldn’t do in his three attempts (1981, 1982, 1984); Seabiscuit couldn’t do (1937, 1938, 1940); Cougar II couldn’t do (1971-73).


    (Click on image to enlarge)

    Yet, in the aftermath of Game On Dude’s magnificent triumph, all I heard about was the “souped-up” racetrack at Santa Anita — a track that many believe aided Game On Dude in his stakes-record clocking of 1:58.17 for 1 ¼ miles.

    OK, the track was very fast at Santa Anita on March 8, 2014… so what?

    Souped-up racetracks have been a part of the game since time immemorial. In fact, the best performance in the history of American racing (at least in my opinion) came over an ultra-glib racing surface.

    Secretariat may have moved like a “tremendous machine” in winning the Belmont Stakes on June 9, 1973, but there is little doubt that the track — and probably, more specifically, the wind — played a major role in his record-shattering 12-furlong time of 2:24 that day.


    Using inflation-adjusted purse values as a guide, it’s arguable that the quality of racing on the dirt was actually a bit better on the day that Game On Dude notched his third Big ‘Cap than on the day that Secretariat became a Triple Crown champion. But look closely at the pace figures (my ESRs and LSRs). Notice how, on June 9, 1973, every single dirt race had a positive pace profile (higher LSR than ESR).

    This is highly unusual and generally only seen in higher class races or at tracks with configuration or timing quirks. In fact, at Santa Anita, only two races featured positive profiles and both were graded stakes — the Grade II San Felipe and the Grade I Santa Anita Handicap.


    (Click on image to enlarge)

    What’s more, the times were fairly similar on June 9, 1973 and March 8, 2014 too.

    Using the old Daily Racing Form track variant method, but including all races to give us a larger sample, we find that the averages for Belmont and Santa Anita are nearly identical — 6.2 and 7.1 respectively. (For those who are unfamiliar with the old DRF track variants, these numbers represent fifths of a second off the track record and were generally maintained for both sprint and route affairs.)

    So where’s the uproar over Big Red’s Belmont time? Where’s the angst over his scintillating performance?

    Look, I get it: Game On Dude is not Secretariat… but he’s not exactly Zippy Chippy either. Is too much to ask for some of the racing fans out there to be happy some of the time and give credit to a horse that has accomplished something historic?

    Early Speed Ration (ESR): A measurement of a horse’s early energy expenditure in relation to the total race requirements. The lower the figure, the greater the horse’s early exertion in that event.

    -15= Demanding.
    -10= Brisk.
      -5= Moderate.
       0= Soft.

    Late Speed Ration (LSR): A measurement of a horse’s late energy expenditure in relation to the total race requirements. The higher the figure, the greater the horse’s late exertion in that event. Because late speed is calculated at a time when a horse is being asked for his/her maximum effort, LSRs can be a great indication of form as well.

       0= Excellent.
      -5= Good.
    -10= Fair.
    -15= Poor.

    Pace Profile: A simple comparison between a horse’s LSR and the ESR of the race in which it was earned. Positive profiles are greatly desired.

    Note: ESRs and LSRs recorded on turf or all-weather surfaces tend to vary by 5-10 points from those garnered on dirt tracks.